Note on terminology: on this site, « CIF » denotes a business service flagged critical under DORA Art. 3(22) — not an abstract function. Why service-level mapping →
SaaS Platform · Built for DORA

DORA Compliance Software for EU Financial Institutions

Stop running DORA on spreadsheets. Resiplan — the specialised SaaS platform built specifically for the Digital Operational Resilience Act — automates the Register of Information, CIF evaluation, incident reporting, third-party risk and TLPT tracking. Audit-ready out of the box.

What is DORA Compliance Software?

DORA compliance software is a specialised SaaS platform that automates the operational deliverables required by Regulation (EU) 2022/2554: maintaining the Register of Information (xBRL-CSV format under ITS 2024/2956), identifying Critical or Important Functions, managing incident reporting timelines (4h/72h/1m), scoring third-party risk, tracking TLPT engagements, and providing audit-ready evidence collection.

Generic GRC platforms cover overlapping concepts but rarely implement the DORA-specific data model. Spreadsheets are unmaintainable past the first annual submission cycle. DORA-specific platforms are typically 5-10× faster to deploy and audit-ready out of the box.

Core Modules of a Complete DORA Platform

Register of Information

Automated xBRL-CSV generation per ITS 2024/2956. 9 mandatory tables, cross-table validators, annual submission deadline tracking.

CIF Evaluation

Tier-based catalogue (T1/T2/T3) + Article 3(22) materiality scoring + RTO threshold engine. Auditable rationale per decision.

Incident Workflow

4h/72h/1m reporting timelines. RTS 2024/1772 classification (7 criteria). ITS 2025/302 XML templates pre-built.

Third-Party Risk

Vendor scoring, contractual clause checker (RTS 2024/1773), subcontracting chain mapping (RTS 2025/532).

TLPT Programme

5 TIBER-EU phases tracked, White Team workflow, attestation lifecycle, vendor selection support.

Compliance Dashboard

Real-time score per pillar, drift detection, board-ready reports, supervisor query tracking.

Spreadsheets vs Generic GRC vs Specialised DORA Platform

Most institutions start DORA with spreadsheets, then attempt to extend an existing GRC tool, before adopting a DORA-specific platform. Skip the first two steps:

Capability Spreadsheets Generic GRC Specialised DORA SaaS
xBRL-CSV RoI generationManual XMLCustom devNative
ITS 2024/2956 templatesNoMaybePre-built
CIF cascade to ICT servicesManual VLOOKUPsCustom rulesBuilt-in
Incident XML templates (ITS 2025/302)NoCustomNative
Audit evidence collectionManualYesAuto + structured
Multi-entity (group submissions)PainfulYesNative group governance
Time to first submission3-6 months2-4 months2-4 weeks
Annual maintenance cost (FTE)1-2 FTE0.5-1 FTE0.1-0.3 FTE

How to Choose DORA Compliance Software (5 Criteria)

  1. DORA-specific data model — verify the platform implements the ITS 2024/2956 RoI structure natively. Generic "compliance management" tools that "support DORA" via custom forms typically fail at the xBRL-CSV step.
  2. CIF evaluation engine — the platform should walk users through Article 3(22) materiality criteria with structured questions, not just a "criticality" tag field.
  3. Incident XML automation — under stress, your team needs the ITS 2025/302 templates pre-validated and ready to submit, not a Word doc to fill in.
  4. Sectoral fit — banking, insurance, payments and investment have different process catalogues. Pre-built taxonomies save weeks of setup.
  5. Audit-trail per decision — supervisors will challenge classification decisions. Every CIF flag, RTO threshold and contractual clause assessment must be evidenced and timestamped.

Why Resiplan Is the Specialised DORA Software for EU Banks

Resiplan is the SaaS platform built from day one for DORA, business continuity and GRC. Not a generic GRC tool with a "DORA module" bolted on — the entire data model, workflows and reporting outputs are aligned with the ESA technical standards.

Try Resiplan Free Explore CIF Module →

Pricing Overview

DORA compliance software pricing typically scales with institution size, number of users and modules activated. Most vendors offer:

Free Trial

0 EUR

14-day full-feature trial. No credit card. Build your CIF register and try the RoI generator.

Start Free

Enterprise

Custom

Multi-entity governance, SSO, custom integrations, dedicated support, SLA, on-prem option.

Contact Sales

Frequently Asked Questions

Is generic GRC software enough for DORA?

Generic GRC platforms cover overlapping concepts but rarely implement the DORA-specific data model: the xBRL-CSV Register of Information template (ITS 2024/2956), the 7 RTS 2024/1772 incident classification criteria, the TIBER-EU TLPT phases, or the CIF cascade. DORA-specific platforms are typically 5-10× faster to deploy and audit-ready out of the box.

Can a single platform cover both DORA and NIS2?

Yes for the overlapping requirements: incident reporting workflows, third-party risk management, BCM/DR. But DORA-specific outputs (xBRL-CSV RoI, TIBER-EU TLPT) are not part of NIS2 and require dedicated functionality.

Do we need to migrate off our current GRC platform?

No. Most specialised DORA platforms integrate via API with existing GRC tools (ServiceNow GRC, Archer, OneTrust) so DORA-specific workflows run on the dedicated platform while your broader risk management stays where it is.

How long does deployment take?

For a mid-size institution, 2-4 weeks from kickoff to first board-ready compliance dashboard. The Register of Information typically takes 2-3 weeks of data collection, separately from platform configuration which is sub-week.

Related Resources

How Compliant Is Your Institution?

Take our free 5-minute assessment and get an instant DORA compliance score with personalised recommendations.

Get Your Free DORA Score Join Free Monthly Webinar