Summary Table of All RTS & ITS

Ref. Type Topic OJ Publication Date DORA Pillar PDF Documents
2024/1774 RTS ICT Risk Management Framework & Simplified Framework 25 June 2024 Pillar 1 rts-ict-risk-management.pdf
2024/1772 RTS Criteria for Classification of ICT-related Incidents 25 June 2024 Pillar 3 rts-incident-classification.pdf
2024/1773 RTS Policy on Contractual Arrangements for ICT Services Supporting Critical or Important Functions 25 June 2024 Pillar 4 rts-third-party-risk.pdf
2025/532 RTS Subcontracting of ICT Services 2 July 2025 Pillar 4
2025/301 RTS Major Incident Reporting: Content & Time Limits 20 February 2025 Pillar 3 rts-incident-reporting.pdf
2025/302 ITS Standard Forms & Templates for Incident Reporting 20 February 2025 Pillar 3 Included in reporting.pdf
2024/2956 ITS Standard Templates for Register of Information 2 December 2024 Pillar 4 Included in third-party.pdf
2025/420 RTS Joint Examination Team (JET) Composition 24 March 2025 Pillar 4 Oversight (authorities)
2025/1190 RTS Threat-Led Penetration Testing (TLPT), drafted in accordance with TIBER-EU 18 June 2025 Pillar 2 rts-tlpt-guide.pdf

Chronological Timeline of Publications

2024

  • 13 March 2024: Adoption of RTS 2024/1774 (Risk Management), 2024/1772 (Incident Classification), 2024/1773 (Third-Party Policies)
  • 25 June 2024: Publication in the EU Official Journal of the first 3 RTS
  • 2 December 2024: Publication of ITS 2024/2956 (Register Templates) in the OJ, adopted on 29 November 2024

2025

  • 17 January 2025: DORA date of application (Art. 64; the Regulation entered into force on 16 January 2023)
  • 20 February 2025: Publication of RTS 2025/301 (Incident Reporting) + ITS 2025/302 (Reporting Templates)
  • 24 March 2025: Adoption of RTS 2025/532 (Subcontracting); publication of RTS 2025/420 (Joint Examination Team) in the OJ
  • 30 April 2025: DEADLINE: First transmission of ICT provider register to authorities
  • 18 June 2025: Publication of RTS 2025/1190 (TLPT) in the OJ (in force 8 July 2025)
  • 2 July 2025: Publication of RTS 2025/532 in the OJ (in force 22 July 2025)

2026–2028

  • 2026: First oversight inspections of critical ICT providers by ESAs
  • By 17 January 2028: Commission review report on DORA (Art. 58). This is not a TLPT deadline: DORA sets no EU-wide date for a first TLPT. Financial entities identified by their competent authority test at least every 3 years (Art. 26(1) and (8)), starting from the TLPT authority's notification (RTS 2025/1190, Art. 9)

The 5 DORA Pillars and Their RTS/ITS

Pillar 1 ICT Risk Management

DORA Articles: 5-16

Applicable RTS: 2024/1774

Key requirements:

  • Documented ICT risk management framework approved by management
  • Complete inventory of ICT assets with criticality classification
  • Identification of Critical or Important Functions (CIFs): the cornerstone concept that drives every other DORA obligation
  • Risk assessments at least annually
  • Business continuity and disaster recovery policy (BCP/DRP) with regular testing
  • Security controls (access, encryption, monitoring, vulnerability management)

Dedicated guide: rts-ict-risk-management.html · CIF methodology

Pillar 2 Digital Operational Resilience Testing

DORA Articles: 24-27

Applicable RTS: 2025/1190 (TLPT, drafted in accordance with the TIBER-EU framework)

Key requirements:

  • Regular resilience tests (vulnerability scans, pentests, etc.)
  • TLPT at least every 3 years for financial entities identified by their competent authority (Art. 26(1) and (8))
  • TIBER-EU methodology or recognized equivalent
  • Independent Red Team + scenarios based on real threat intelligence
  • Remediation of identified vulnerabilities with timeline

Dedicated guide: rts-tlpt-guide.html

Pillar 3 ICT-related Incident Management & Reporting

DORA Articles: 17-23

Applicable RTS: 2024/1772 (Classification) + 2025/301 (Reporting)

Applicable ITS: 2025/302 (Templates)

Key requirements:

  • Incident classification according to 7 RTS 2024/1772 criteria: (1) clients/transactions, (2) reputational impact, (3) duration, (4) geographical spread, (5) data losses, (6) criticality of services affected, (7) economic impact
  • Major incident reporting:
    • Initial: T+4 hours
    • Intermediate: T+72 hours
    • Final: T+1 month
  • Voluntary notification of significant cyber threats
  • Use of standardized XML templates (ITS 2025/302)

Dedicated guides: rts-incident-classification.html + rts-incident-reporting.html

The 4h clock is brutal. Resiplan triggers automated incident workflows matching the 6 RTS criteria, with built-in XML templates for supervisor submission. See Workflow →

Pillar 4 Third-Party Risk Management

DORA Articles: 28-44

Contract clauses: DORA Article 30 (9 elements for every ICT contract, 6 more for critical or important functions)

Applicable RTS: 2024/1773 (Third-party policy) + 2025/532 (Subcontracting)

Applicable ITS: 2024/2956 (Register)

Key requirements:

  • Mandatory contractual clauses (Art. 30):
    • Service description, locations of services and data, data protection and return (every contract)
    • Incident assistance, cooperation with authorities, termination rights and notice periods (every contract)
    • Full service levels, contingency plans, TLPT participation (critical or important functions)
    • Unrestricted access, inspection and audit rights, exit strategy with a transition period (critical or important functions)
  • ICT provider register: Annual transmission to authorities (first time: 30 April 2025)
  • Subcontracting of critical or important functions: assessment before signing, contract conditions, notice of material changes with a reasonable period to approve or object (RTS 2025/532, Art. 3 to 5)
  • Termination if the provider subcontracts or changes the chain against the contract (RTS 2025/532, Art. 6)

Dedicated guide: rts-third-party-risk.html

Tip: Resiplan automates the Register of Information (ITS 2024/2956 template), generate and submit it in 2 clicks instead of spreadsheet work. Discover →

Pillar 5 Information Sharing

DORA Articles: 45-47

RTS/ITS status: No specific RTS (voluntary arrangements)

Key requirements:

  • Possibility to establish voluntary arrangements for sharing cyber threat information
  • Protection of sensitive and commercial data
  • No legal obligation, but strongly encouraged
  • Examples: Sectoral ISACs, IOC sharing (Indicators of Compromise)

Documentation: ESA Guidelines (no dedicated RTS)

Priorities by Compliance Phase

Phase 1: IMMEDIATE (January–April 2025). Urgent

  • Incident Management:
    • Implement classification process (RTS 2024/1772)
    • Create notification templates
    • Obtain access to supervisor portal + eIDAS certificates
    • Train IT/SOC teams on reporting deadlines (4h/72h/1 month)
  • ICT Provider Register:
    • List ALL ICT providers
    • Complete register according to ITS 2024/2956 template
    • Submit before 30 April 2025 (ABSOLUTE DEADLINE)
  • Governance:
    • Board briefing on DORA obligations
    • Designation of ICT risk management function
    • Validation of ICT risk strategy

Phase 2: SHORT TERM (Q2–Q3 2025). High Priority

  • Third-Party Risk Management:
    • Gap analysis of all existing contracts vs. DORA Article 30
    • Launch contract renegotiations (critical functions priority)
    • Implement subcontracting approval process (RTS 2025/532)
  • ICT Risk Management:
    • Complete ICT asset inventory
    • Classification by criticality
    • First complete risk assessment
    • Documentation of ICT policies compliant with RTS 2024/1774
  • BCP/DRP:
    • Review continuity plans
    • Define RTO/RPO
    • Test plans (at least annually)

Phase 3: MEDIUM TERM (Q4 2025 – 2026). Medium Priority

  • Contract Finalization:
    • Complete renegotiations with ALL critical/important providers
    • Migrate to new providers if DORA clauses refused
  • Security Controls:
    • Enhanced monitoring (SIEM, logs, alerting)
    • Generalized MFA implementation
    • Improved network segmentation
    • Patch management program
  • Audits & Tests:
    • Internal DORA compliance audits
    • Annual pentests
    • BCP/DRP tests

Phase 4: LONG TERM (2027–2028). Normal

  • TLPT (if identified by your competent authority, Art. 26(8)):
    • Prepare before notification: initiation information is due within 3 months of the TLPT authority's notification (RTS 2025/1190, Art. 9(2))
    • Scope specification document, approved by the management body, within 6 months of the notification (Art. 9(6))
    • Active red team testing phase of at least 12 weeks (Art. 11(5))
    • Repeat at least every 3 years (DORA Art. 26(1)); the competent authority may shorten or extend that frequency
  • Continuous Improvement:
    • Integration of lessons learned from incidents
    • Process optimization
    • Annual review of all DORA elements

Want Your DORA Compliance Score: In Minutes?

Run our free interactive Gap Analysis: a compliance score and your top priority actions across the five pillars, no call and no signup.

Run the free Gap Analysis →

Index of Available PDF Documents

Absolute Deadlines Not to Miss

Date Obligation Concerns Penalty if Non-Compliant
17 Jan. 2025 Full application of DORA All EU financial entities Administrative penalties and remedial measures set by national law (Art. 50), no EU-wide cap
30 April 2025 First transmission of ICT provider register All financial entities (via their competent authority) Administrative penalties and remedial measures set by national law (Art. 50)
Ongoing from Jan 2025 Major incident reporting (4h/72h/1 month) All entities Non-notification and delay: administrative penalties set by national law (Art. 50)
On notification First TLPT, started on notification from the TLPT authority (RTS 2025/1190, Art. 9); no EU-wide date Financial entities identified by their competent authority (Art. 26(8)) Administrative penalties and remedial measures set by national law (Art. 50)
Annual (every 30 April) ICT provider register update All entities Administrative penalties and remedial measures set by national law (Art. 50)
At least every 3 years TLPT (after the first), frequency adjustable by the competent authority (Art. 26(1)) Financial entities identified by their competent authority Administrative penalties and remedial measures set by national law (Art. 50)

DORA sets no EU-wide maximum fine for financial entities: Article 50 leaves administrative penalties to national law, so the amount depends on the Member State. The only turnover-based percentage in the Regulation applies to designated critical ICT third-party providers (periodic penalty payments capped at 1% of average daily worldwide turnover, Article 35).

Links and Official Resources

Official EUR-Lex Texts

Supervisory Authorities

European Commission

Practical Advice for Compliance

1. Pillar-by-Pillar Approach

Don't do everything at once. Prioritize:

  1. Pillar 3 (Incidents): Immediate risk if incident occurs from January 2025
  2. Pillar 4 (Third-Party): Register deadline 30 April 2025
  3. Pillar 1 (Risk Management): Foundation for everything else
  4. Pillar 2 (Testing): Longer timeline (TLPT starts on notification from the TLPT authority)
  5. Pillar 5 (Sharing): Voluntary, consider later

2. Internal Resources

Build a cross-functional team:

  • Executive sponsor: Board member (DORA mandatory)
  • DORA project leader: Centralized coordination
  • CISO / IT Security: Technical aspects
  • Compliance / Legal: Regulatory interpretation
  • Risk Management: Risk assessments
  • IT Operations: Practical implementation
  • Procurement: Vendor contract management

3. Budgeting

DORA and its RTS set no cost figures, and we do not publish ballpark ranges we cannot source. Budget by cost line, sized on your own scope:

  • External support: gap analysis and implementation support, driven by the pillars and entities in scope
  • Technology tools: monitoring, logging and GRC tooling, usually a recurring annual cost
  • Contract remediation: legal time to bring ICT contracts in line with Art. 30, driven by the number of contracts supporting critical or important functions
  • TLPT (only if your competent authority identifies you, Art. 26(8)): threat intelligence provider, external testers and internal control team time, for an active red team phase of at least 12 weeks (RTS 2025/1190, Art. 11(5)), at least every 3 years
  • Staff training: including the ICT risk training of the management body (Art. 5(4))

4. Points of Vigilance

  • Don't underestimate timelines: Contract renegotiations can take 6–12 months
  • Hyperscaler resistance: AWS/Azure/GCP have their own timelines, anticipate
  • Exhaustive documentation required: Plan resources for writing/maintenance
  • Ongoing operational burden: DORA is not a one-shot project but a permanent change

Download All DORA Guides as PDF

Get the TLPT guide, incident reporting templates, and the complete RTS overview in print-ready format: free.

Free Downloads →

Run Your DORA Gap Analysis

Interactive tool: see where your institution stands against each of the 13 RTS/ITS in under 15 minutes.

Start Free Gap Analysis →
🚀
Next Step · Automate It

Now You Know the Gaps: Close Them With Resiplan

Resiplan runs all five DORA pillars in one platform: no more dozens of spreadsheets and a dedicated team to keep them in sync. Turn your one-off assessment into continuous compliance: automated register of information, incident tracking, vendor risk monitoring, real-time dashboards. Advising several institutions? Each client gets its own separate tenant.

Automated RoI submission
Incident reporting workflow
Vendor risk scoring
Real-time compliance dashboard

7-day free trial · No credit card · Cancel anytime